by Doms Desk
Contents
- 1 Who was Adriel Alvarado Jr?
- 2 How did he die?
- 3 Was the shooting justified?
- 4 What was the reaction of the transgender community?
- 5 What are the implications of the case?
Who was Adriel Alvarado Jr?
Adriel Alvarado Jr was a 36-year-old man from North Philadelphia who had a criminal record of nine arrests, including a third-degree murder conviction. He was also a transgender activist and the husband of Monae Alvarado, a prominent transgender woman who met him while they were both incarcerated at a Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution.
How did he die?
Adriel Alvarado Jr died on April 19, 2022, after he and another suspect invaded the home of a 25-year-old man in Mayfair, Philadelphia. The two suspects were wearing masks and claimed to be police officers. Alvarado was also wearing a federal agent gold shield around his neck. The two suspects, at least one of whom was armed, demanded money, forced the homeowner near the stairwell, and began to zip tie him. The homeowner then used his free hand to grab a 9mm Glock handgun from his pocket and opened fire at the two suspects. Alvarado was shot in the head, arm and chest. He died at a nearby hospital shortly before 10:30 p.m. The second suspect fled the scene and remains at large.
Was the shooting justified?
The Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office announced on April 20, 2022, that the shooting was a justifiable homicide and that the homeowner, who had a valid permit to carry, would not face any charges. The DA’s office said that the homeowner acted in self-defense and that the evidence supported his account of the incident. The homeowner and his girlfriend, who was upstairs at the time, were taken in for questioning and released a short time later.
What was the reaction of the transgender community?
The death of Adriel Alvarado Jr sparked outrage and grief among the transgender community, especially among his friends and family. His wife, Monae Alvarado, posted a tribute video on her YouTube channel, where she has over 200,000 subscribers. She said that she loved him and that he was her soulmate. She also said that he was not a bad person and that he was trying to change his life. She blamed the system for failing him and for not giving him a chance to transition. She also accused the homeowner of lying and of being a racist.
Many of Monae’s fans and supporters expressed their condolences and their anger at the injustice of the situation. They said that Adriel was a victim of transphobia and discrimination. They also questioned the legitimacy of the homeowner’s self-defense claim and the DA’s decision. They demanded justice for Adriel and his family.
However, some people disagreed with Monae and her supporters. They said that Adriel was a criminal who deserved what he got. They said that he was not a real transgender person and that he was using his identity as an excuse for his actions. They also said that the homeowner was brave and heroic for defending himself and his girlfriend. They praised the DA’s office for clearing him of any wrongdoing.
What are the implications of the case?
The case of Adriel Alvarado Jr’s cause of death is a controversial and complex one that raises many questions and issues. It highlights the challenges and struggles that transgender people face in society, especially those who are incarcerated or have criminal records. It also exposes the flaws and gaps in the criminal justice system and the prison system, which often fail to protect and support transgender inmates. It also shows the potential dangers and consequences of home invasion and self-defense, which can result in fatal outcomes and legal disputes. It also reveals the polarized and divided opinions and attitudes that people have towards transgender people and their rights. It also demonstrates the power and influence of social media and online platforms, which can shape public perception and discourse.
The case of Adriel Alvarado Jr’s cause of death is not a simple or straightforward one. It is a tragic and complicated one that involves multiple perspectives and factors. It is a case that deserves attention and respect, not judgment and hate. It is a case that calls for compassion and understanding, not violence and discrimination. It is a case that demands justice and reform, not ignorance and indifference.
